Showing posts with label Big Ten. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Big Ten. Show all posts

Monday, October 13, 2008

Roundtables? Roundup.

Last week was, uh, not so good in the whole "posting new content" realm. Oh sure, we got around to some things, but when the number 1 tag of the week is "functionality" which is a fancy way of saying "post about how we don't have time to post" that ain't good.

I did host the Big Ten Blogger's roundtable, which was done "Jeopardy" style; I provided the answers, and the bloggers provided the questions. The participating blogs:

Off The Tracks
Enlightened Spartan
Happy Hour Valley
Maize and Blue Nation
Varsity Blue
The Nittany Line
Maize n' Brew
Boiled Sports
Lake the Posts
Ground Zero East Lansing
Black Heart Gold Pants
The Buckeye Battle Cry

Chances are you've read it already, but Black Heart Gold Pants used the format to launch into a celebrity Jeopardy parody of sorts involving JoePa. Read it, like, right now. No seriously, read it, then come back.

Now that you're back, lets take a look at some of the answers I provided, along with the correct questions:

Answer: Jay Paterno and the Spread HD

Most (read: all) went with a play on the fact that "spread" could applied to your legs, and that "HD" sounded a lot like "VD." The correct question, however, was "How the hell is this working so well" or "Surely Jay's just getting lucky here, right?"

Answer: Joe Tiller's Mustache

Full points to Maize n' Brew, who knew that whenever Joe Tiller's name is invoked, the correct answer is always:


Answer: The Color Purple

The correct question, of course, was "What is the classic novel by Alice Walker chronicling the life of Celie, a poor black woman in the rural South." Christ, do none of you read?

We also accepted "The color of Pat Fitzgerald's penis"

Answer: Brains

Full points all around here, as most took this softball and lobbed it out of the park. The correct answer was "What's for dinner?"

Answer: Hawkeye State

Hawkeye State is not Iowa, nor is it the "state" of fans of Iowa. I thought this was clear, and apparently it wasn't. I meant Iowa Blogger "Hawkeye State" of BHGP. We would have accepted anything involving an Elephant Walk.

Answer: Rudy

We accepted both Varsity Blue's succinct response of "Shitty Midget" as well as Happy Hour Valley's more lengthy response of "Who is a giant douche that managed to be the subject of an “inspiring film” about his lame-ass story of walking on to America’s most hated college football team and going from towel boy to getting a sack in his final home game despite being offsides?"

Answer: Knee Ligaments

The correct response was, of course, "aaaaaaaaaairgggggg" or any variation thereof.

Answer: Terrelle Pryor

Varsity Blue, again: "Why am: I fucking terrified of Ohio State?"

We also would have accepted any variation of "dumbo" "radar ears" or "holy hell this kid is going to destroy everything in his path for the next 3 years god-damnit why the hell does Ohio State get these kids, Columbus isn't even that cool, fuuuuuuck."

Answer: Mark May

Ground Zero East Lansing sums it up thusly: "Who is the biggest benefactor of the "Ugly Friend" effect? You know the theory - all sets of girls have one ugly friend that makes the others look better by comparison. Who is Mark May's ugly friend? You guessed it...Lou Holtz"

Answer: Rich Rodriguez

Boiled Sports: Who fooled Michigan?

Well played, for this season.

And that wraps up the wrap up. Sorry for the delay, and enjoy your Monday!


Wednesday, September 3, 2008

BTB Roundtable

Roundtables. They have begun. This week, our questions are brought to us by our frenemies (upgraded from Mortal Foe) Black Heart Gold Pants. Some questions are team specific, and I will attempt to give you the rational fan's answer for each team:

Week 1's in the books. What surprised you about your team? Are you optimistic? Disappointed? (NOTE: Purdue does not apply here, so these fans must talk about Wake Forest instead)

Illinois: A Lemanless defense is not one that I care to be a part of. I am disappointed, but only because I bought into the preseason notion that Illinois was better than a 7 win ballclub.

Indiana: We only return 2 scholarship players next year? WTF? You'd better get it together Crean. Wait. Football?

Iowa: Bad: We suck at quarterback. Good: All our QB's would start for Michigan. Yeah! Dickrod! Plus it was Maine, and like, they suck.

Michigan: Sure, that first game was bad, but give it like, 3 years. We'll be better then!

Michigan State: SPARTAHHHHHohwaitwe'renotthatgood.

Minnesota: [stunned silence at victory]

Northwestern: Woo. Bring on Duke.

Ohio State: PAAAAAAAAAAAAANIC...what's that? He's not hurt that bad? Sweet. We're gonna eat you, bitches.

Penn State: [too high to respond]

Purdue: Suck it, Baylor.

Wisconsin: Jump Around. Jump Around. Jump Around.

Beanie Wells' foot is definitely the top story in the conference. What's #2?


I think there were several very interesting story lines for the conference aside from Beanie Wells' foot. First, Michigan's inneptitude on offense wasn't surprising, but uh, yeah, they suck really bad. Minnesota's win is encouraging, seeing as they have now matched their season total from last year. I thought Penn State laying 66 on whoever the hell terrible team they played was impressive. Finally, the combined failures of Michigan, Illinois, and Michigan State in the three marquee OOC games further reinforces the fact that the Big Ten is still a mediocre conference nationally.

Admit it: you loathe DickFraudROFL (né Rich Rodriguez), but when Michigan scored that last touchdown, you were rooting for them to make the 2-pt. conversion.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, I get it: you're happy that Michigan lost because Michigan for years has represented that team that was unstoppably evil and curb stomped your team 3 out of every 4 years. However, I think what OPS is getting at here is this: Michigan '08 isn't that Michigan. In fact, they're a different Michigan than the last 50 years worth of "Michigans" have been. They're overmatched, young, small, and rather uncoordinated. Seeing this team lose to Utah shouldn't bring you joy, because it's not the same team you're used to rooting against. I am a Michigan fan; I was rooting for the conversion. Anyone who is a fan of the underdog should be rooting for Michigan this year as well; lord knows they're going to need it.

Is this weekend's slate of games actually less interesting than last week's?

Yes. By a long shot. I fully expect the Big Ten to run the table this week, barring the entire Penn State football team being dismissed by new interim head coach Jeremy Schapp.

Don't you hate pants?

Here's what I don't get about pants: why plural? Are there two pants that you put on? I mean - socks-as-plural makes sense, there are two of them. Same with "shoes." But why they hell are pants plural? Does each leg count as one "pant?" And what the hell is going on with "pair of pants?" There is NO PAIR. Fuck pants. I'm never wearing them again.

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

The Two Guys Using Logic Poll…

Brought to you by Beauford and Champ. No, we’re not in any particular poll guild or league that will combine our individual thoughts into some larger consortium and produce a super-poll that is greater than the sum of its individual parts. Rather, it’s just us… which is fine. Here’s how it’ll work. Each week B-squared and I will each come up with our version of the Logic Poll and compare. We will then tally up each team’s rank in each of our polls and add it together… lowest cumulative total is ranked highest, and we go on down the line. If two teams happen to tie at the end of the season, B2 and I will retreat to our bat-cave and determine which team is deserving of a higher rank through a complex process of coin-flips and arguments filled with hyperbole.

If there is a large disagreement in rank for a particular team between our two submissions… like, I don’t know… say Penn State for example, you know just for example’s sake and all. Anyways, if there’s a discrepancy then we will attempt to give you, the reader, some kind of justification for why we think that team is much better/worse than the other seems to. I know you can feel the excitement building can’t you?

Yes, I can barely contain myself; I haven’t been this excited since Tim Dwight learned how to catch punts and we decided to put feathery things on our jerseys...




My goodness, it's Hayden Fry! Welcome! That was quite a look coach…

Your damn right it was, pink locker-room, feathers, mandatory dresses for Saturday morning walk-throughs, by God whatever it took to win… Now get back to your poll.


Alright.

Wait... just how do you handle if one team is unranked in one half of your poll but ranked in the other?



Good question coach. Unranked gets a total 26 added for the unranked value (arbitrary as hell) and a big asterisk in front of their name so that we make sure to consider that the following week. Hopefully, the number of asterisks diminishes as time goes on... naturally, however, towards the bottom of the Top 25 there's going to be some.


Fair enough, we settled disputes for starting roles by having players pillow-fight in the visiting locker-room, but your idea could work too. Continue on.


Alrighty. So here’s the official preseason Logic Poll brought to you by Beauford and Champ (ties stand for now because, frankly, it'll all work out as we get on down the road):

1. University of Ohio State (2)
2. Oklahoma (5)
2. USC (5)
4. Georgia (8)
5. Florida (11)
5. Missouri (11)
7. Clemson (14)
8. West Virginia (18)
9. LSU (20)
10. Texas (22)
11. Va Tech (24)
12. Penn State (26)
12. Auburn (26)
14. BYU (31)
15. Wisconsin (33)
15. South Florida (33)
17. Tennessee (34)
18. Texas Tech (37)
18. Utah (37)
20. ** Arizona State (39)
21. Wake Forest (40)
22. ** Kansas (41)
23. Michigan (45)
23. Oregon (45)
25. ** Cal (47)
------- Others Receiving Consideration-------
- Central Michigan (49)
- Michigan State (51)

So there you have it! Preseason fillibustering at its best. Now for the airing of grievances:

A. Penn State... Beauford says they're a top ten team because they'll likely finish second in the Big 10... Champ politely disagrees and thinks that extreme caution should be exercised on highly ranking any team with Jay Paterno involved, especially when it has a "new" offense, no experience at quarterback, and no real offensive playmakers to speak of... oh and their defense continues to break extremities and such. Penn State ends up 12th in the preseason poll, which is still six spots too high. Of course if they get past the Beavers of Oregon State, they play nobody until a buzz-saw of Wisconsin, Michigan, and Ohio State all in a row.

B. West Virginia - Blue-light special here... both Beauford and I think that WVU could be in for a significant case of Bobby Williams Fever here in a month or two. We rank them up in the Top 10 thanks to another paint-peeling performance in a bowl game, but let's just say that we doubt Bill Stewart's ability just a tad... particularly now that nearly the entire staff is gone, gone, gone.

C. South Florida... Beauford has them in the top 10... they end up 15th in our preseason poll largely due to my placing them near the bottom of the Top 25. I happen to think there are more than only 8 or 9 teams out there that would beat South Florida, perhaps they'll prove me wrong.

D. Arizona State... I had them in the top 15 because they're a decent football team in a crappy conference. We'll see what happens.

Monday, July 14, 2008

Penn State 2008 (it rhymes!!!)

Masks? Check. Football Unis? Check. Joe Pa get-up? You betcha. Smart-phone nicely clipped to football pants? Um... check.

So, having poked around BSD for most of this off-season, I feel decently comfortable in placing the majority of Penn State fans' expectations for this upcoming season at: "high" on the big board. Why not? There's a lot to be confident about from a Nittany Lion perspective, there are also a few things that I don't see getting a lot of mention around the Blue and White corner of the world that one might go ahead and place on the "question mark" list. How does it all sort out? Well let's embark upon that mystery together dear reader!

One thing the media will harp on that is ridiculously off-base:
Well, it will be next to impossible for anyone to top the pure buffoonery that was Kirk Herbstreit's prediction of greatness from Anthony Morelli to lead Penn State to the summit of the Big 10 mountain. I wish I had taped a few of those segments prior to last fall, but this will have to suffice: go ahead and scroll down to the "What a Difference a Year Makes" category and enjoy.

This year? I don't know. Much focus will undoubtedly be on JoePa, but I have a feeling we'll hear more about the way that the old coach is "opening back up the offense" for his new quarterback(s)... a return to 2005 no less. That statement in and of itself isn't off-base, but here's the rub. Penn State has shown a tendenancy to play several BIG games in a very close to the vest fashion, particularly on the road. Last year that was the Michigan game in Ann Arbor. We've been down this road, but suffice to say that Michigan couldn't possibly hope to stop an offense in the spread formation at the start of the year... surely, Penn State and staff were well aware of this... and instead of simply following a blueprint that had been clearly laid out two weeks in a row for them by App State and Oregon, they came into Michigan Stadium and threw rock...

Turns out we have a bigger rock

Oh sure, it's a bit self-serving to throw up that picture (sue me) but it does illustrate a point. Penn State was #10 in the nation that day and had a chance to really make a run at the rest of their schedule after this hurdle... suffice to say it was a big game for them against an ailing Michigan squad, and they packed it in. Penn State fans will tell you it's not the first time. If Penn State has success with this new offense, it won't mean much if they don't take it with them to Camp Randall and to the Shoe. Yes the offense is experienced at most spots, yes the defense looks to be another strength, but what has changed on the staff and in the recruiting game that makes this Penn State team different from so many that have come before it? That's a question I just don't see being asked or answered much thus far this year.

One thing the media will completely ignore that is integral to this team's success: This team's lack of a reliable and/or proven offensive weapon. Having a new QB isn't as huge of a hindrance to your offense if you have a go-to guy who can bail you out when needed, but when I look at this Penn State offense, I have a hard time picking out that guy. Is there talent? Sure. But what has it done thus far that makes you comfortable pointing as anyone being the "go-to" playmaker in '08?

Something else you won't read about coming into this season:
1. Over the last 8 years, Penn State is a .500 football team in the Big 10 conference.
2. Over the last 5 years, Penn State is a sub .500 football team in the Big 10 conference.
3. Last year's record against winning football teams was... you guessed it, .500.

So that begs a question or two if you ask me. Yes Penn State returns a lot of players, especially on the lines, but the key question is not just of experience, but of talent. Just how good is this team? Who has the chance to become the playmaker on this football team? Who is going to be a guy on offense who will give Penn State a deep threat? Oh, and just one more thing: yes Penn State is returning to a more "2005" offensive approach, but Michael Robinson isn't the guy handling the pigskin, will whomever assumes that role be able to manage an offense that doesn't seem to feature any kind of a safety blanket? At what point will PSU's inability to bring in offensive firepower become an issue that people outside of the PSU circle (aka the media) start to discuss?

Oh, and we'll hear plenty about Sean Lee's absence from the field, but perhaps a more intriguing question is how much his leadership will be missed as well.

Area that scares you as an opponent: D-line. This D-line will be the heart and soul of what figures to be another solid defense. They are talented and they are deep. If the front four play well it will make the loss of Sean Lee not nearly as big of a deal from an on-field standpoint. The offense has loads of experience (perhaps not the talent to match) in nearly every position with the exception of the backfield. If Daryll Clark and Steven Green step up into serviceable roles, there's going to be reason for some of the optimism circulating in Happy Valley. Michigan had a similar set-up in '04 and took two freshmen in Chad Henne and Mike Hart to the Rose Bowl... of course we also had a Braylon Edwards...

Area that makes you salivate as an opponent: JayPa. He's the Penn State Mike DeBord.

Random factor that you think will come into play this season: A joke of an out-of-conference schedule sets up PSU for a run of @Purdue, @Wisconsin, Michigan, and @OSU. Let's just imagine that PSU runs out to 6-0... that leaves three HUGE games:
- @ Wisconsin (a team Penn State DRILLED last year)
- Michigan (a game most Penn State fans are oddly overlooking...)
- @ Ohio State (a team that has somewhat owned Penn State in Columbus)

That's quite a stretch in the heart of the season, and two out of three on the road no less. If anything, I doubt the ability of the coaching staff to put together three straight solid gameplans, especially with having to travel to Columbus. Penn State has every opportunity to field a very solid football team, but I think this stretch (and really the overall stretch of 4 road games in 5 weeks) will cost them a truly great season.

Overall record: 9-3

Final Big 10 standing: 5-3, pick two from the following: Michigan, Purdue, and Wisconsin. Chalk another up to the Buckeyes.

Bowl destination: New Year's Day somewhere.

Friday, June 20, 2008

Compare/Contrast

To wrap up part 2 of the BTB's preseason awards, I thought I'd do some compare/contrast ramblings with what turned out to be the tabulated results.

Here is what the BTB voted.

Offense

QB - Curtis Painter, Purdue
RB - Beanie Wells, Ohio State
RB - Javon Ringer, Michigan State
WR - Brian Robiskie, Ohio State
WR - Arrelious Benn, Illinois
WR - Greg Orton, Purdue
TE/SB - Travis Beckum, Wisconsin
OT - Alex Boone, Ohio State
OG - Steve Rehring, Ohio State
C - AQ Shipley, Penn State
OG - Kraig Urbik, Wisconsin
OT - Eric Vanden Heuvel, Wisconsin

For those not paying attention, here is what I voted:

QB: C.J. Bacher NW
RB: Chris Wells OSU
RB: Javon Ringer MSU
WR: Arrelious Benn IL
WR: Brian Robiskie OSU
WR: Brian Hartline OSU
TE: Travis Beckem WI
OT: Alex Boone OSU
OT: Gerald Cadogan PSU
OG: Jon Skinner OSU
OG: Steve Schilling UM
C: Ryan McDonald IL

Apparently, I was one of two who voted for C.J. Bacher - with the other being LTP themselves. I am genuinely surprised by this, as I genuinely doubt the playmaking ability of Curtis Painter. He was best described as "middling" last season, and I don't see Purdue getting any better as a team this season.

I was dead on with running backs, which is no surprise given that Beanie Wells is a definite Heisman favorite, and Javon Ringer has been good since he first strapped 'em up for the Spartans. I would have loved to see the final results of the vote to see how close P.J. Hill was to getting that second slot. On a tangent - why did everyone fall off the "P.J. Hill is the second coming" bandwagon? Take a look at his stats:

2006

1569 Yards
15 TD's
121 YPG
5.05 YPC

2007

1212 Yards
14 TD's
111 YPG
5.20 YPC

He played in 2 less games in '07, which is why his total yards and (probably) TD's are down, but other than that, it looks like a carbon copy of his 2006 campaign that saw him earn Big Ten Freshman of the Year honors.

My wideout picks were pretty much dead on. Greg Orton could be good - but only as good as Painter. Apparently, the BTB as a group think higher of Purdue than I do. I knew that it was either going to be Hartline or Robiskie in the final tally - and I was right. My hypothetical 4th pick would have been for Greg Matthews before Orton.

The Tight End position was such a foregone conclusion that I'm not going to even say "told you so."

In hindsight, I completely missed Rehring, who should have definitely been included on my vote. Other than that, I believe the linemen I selected have just as much probability of being awesome as any of those who made the final cut.

Defense


Final Vote:

DE- Greg Middleton, Indiana
DE - Maurice Evans, Penn State
DT - Terrance Taylor, Michigan
DT - Mitch King, Iowa
LB - James Laurinaitis, Ohio State
LB - Marcus Freeman, Ohio State
LB - Anthony Heygood, Purdue
S - Anthony Scirrotto, Penn State
S - Anderson Russell, Ohio State
CB - Malcolm Jenkins, Ohio State
CB - Vontae Davis, Illinois

Beauford's vote:

CB: Morgan Trent MI
CB: Vontae Davis IL
SS: Anthony Scirrotto PSU
FS: Shane Carter WI
OLB: James Laurinitis OSU
OLB: Marcus Freeman OSU
MLB: Greg Jones MSU
DE: Maurice Evans PSU
DE: Greg Middleton IN
DT: John Gill NW
DT: Terrence Taylor MI

Ignore the formatting issues here - it's Friday.

I knew that Jenkins would get the final nod - and probably deservedly so. I still believe that Morgan Trent is going to have an outstanding year - but he is definitely a long-shot compared to Jenkins. Carter is kind of in the same vein as Trent - but he's more a complete unknown. His season last year was the kind of charmed season that DB's are sometimes presented with. 7 INT's in 13 games and, IIRC, he wasn't even a full-time starter. I think, given the year's development, the fact that he's on a Biliema defense, and his already proven nose for the ball, he could have a monster year to unseat Russell for the All Conference nod.

I am actually shocked that Greg Jones didn't make the final cut. We all knew that the two linebackers from Ohio State would make it - but Anthony Heygood beats out Greg Jones (who? Greg Jooanes)?

Stat comparison:

Total tackles

Jones - 78
Heygood - 80

Sacks

Jones - 4.5
Heygood - 1 and even this one is "iffy"

TFL's

Jones - 8.5
Heygood - 14

The only thing that Heygood has a clear advantage in is TFL's, while getting blown out in sacks. I had to really dig to find how many sacks Heygood had last year - finally landing on "one" from a Purdue website. All my usual stats pages didn't have him listed - hence the "iffy" assessment. Mark it down now - Greg Jones is going to not only be All-Conference this year - he's going to be in the running for some All-American teams.

King for Gill is the only other discrepancy - and one that I can live with.

Totals


Overall, I was 13 for 23 on total picks being "correct" if the final BTB vote is to be considered correct. It should be noted that 4 of those incorrect picks were due to my own (admitted) lack of knowledge on offensive line play. The only egregious error on my part was the omission of Steve Rehring. Otherwise, I stand by my picks in their entirety.

Feel differently? Enlighten me in the comments section.

Thursday, June 19, 2008

BTN and Comcast have domestic partnership, mulling over move to California or Massachusetts.

Here you go.

BTB Preseason Awards Show: Part II

A huge thanks to LTP for hosting/doing the grunt work for these awards. The final results are now up, but you'll have to go over there to find them (at least for today). We're going to go ahead and reveal our picks for the 1st team defense today, and do a compare/contrast tomorrow.

On with the show:

BEAUFORD'S 1ST TEAM ALL CONFERENCE DEFENSE

CB: Morgan Trent MI
CB: Vontae Davis IL
SS: Anthony Scirrotto PSU
FS: Shane Carter WI
OLB: James Laurinitis OSU
OLB: Marcus Freeman OSU
MLB: Greg Jones MSU
DE: Maurice Evans PSU
DE: Greg Middleton IN
DT: John Gill NW
DT: Terrence Taylor MI

Eyebrow Raisers

If there is anybody on this list capable of inducing a serious eyebrow raise, it's Morgan Trent at corner. Here's why I picked him:

1) He's got a ton of experience. Cornerback is, in my opinion, the hardest position to play. You've got to have raw athleticism combined with schematic knowledge (when you have help, when you don't) and the ability to anticipate the offensive playcall. It's as much a thinking man's position as any on the field - and experience plays a huge role in that development.

2) The athleticism is there; this has never been questioned:



3) Donovan Warren - who has garnered some all conference votes himself - is on the other corner. For the first time in a long time, Michigan has two cornerbacks who are legitimately shut-down. There is no escaping them; only hoping that inexperienced safety play will bring them down. Trent will have the opportunity to make big plays - and I think his experience and athleticism will allow him to do so.

4) I couldn't bring myself to vote for another Ohio State defender...

Fringe Picks

There really isn't anyone else on this list that I feel that I have to defend too heavily. Maybe John Gill at Northwestern? He's listed on the Outland Trophy and Nagurski trophy watch lists, and he is one of 4 returning linemen. If our ridiculously early preview of Northwestern is to be believed, line play is going to be paramount to the Wildcat's success this year. I can only assume that a new defensive coordinator will make this a priority, and as such, Gill can be expected to have a monster season.

Duh

Everyone else. This list was much easier to pick than the offense, and (sneak preview!) the matches of our picks to the BTB picks reflect this.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

BTB Preseason Awards Show is Like Hiter

Just like the Boston Celtics and Hitler, the BTB's preseason awards show marches along, blindly destroying everything in its path, except instead of Poland, it's the aspirations of every Big Ten school except Ohio State.

The awards, kindly hosted by our friends Lake the Posts, now move from preseason team standings to preseason All-Conference performers, first and second team. Every blogger submitted their picks for first team all-conference, and LTP is currently tabulating the results, and throwing together a coherent (hopefully) output. In an attempt at spreading content out, we'll dole out our own picks for 1st team Offense today, Defense tomorrow, vicious attack on any idiotic picks on Friday.

Cruise over to Lake the Posts tomorrow morning for the consensus 1st and 2nd teams.

BEAUFORD'S 1st TEAM ALL CONFERENCE OFFENSE

QB: C.J. Bacher NW
RB: Chris Wells OSU
RB: Javon Ringer MSU
WR: Arrelious Benn IL
WR: Brian Robiskie OSU
WR: Brian Hartline OSU
TE: Travis Beckem WI
OT: Alex Boone OSU
OT: Gerald Cadogan PSU
OG: Jon Skinner OSU
OG: Steve Schilling UM
C: Ryan McDonald IL

Eyebrow Raisers:

The biggest and baddest of the "huh?" picks here is C.J. Bacher at QB. I know, I know - he plays for a Northwestern, and no, this isn't a shameless attempt to get linked by LTP. Take a look at his stats from last year:

304 YPG (1st in conference)
19 TD's (6th in conference)
19 INT's (Um...worst in conference)
3656 total yards (2nd in conference)
61% completion (3rd in conference)

That, my friends, is a rather impressive junior year. Take into account that Northwestern has a new OC, as well as the natural improvement anyone not named "Henne" makes from junior to senior seasons, and C.J. could have an incredible "why the heck is this guy at Northwestern" type season. If he does anything in the way of leading Northwestern over a "traditional powerhouse" then the media will latch onto him like that crazy freshman girl you "dated" in college. Since I'm overweight and live in my mom's basement, I can only assume that metaphor fits. Also of note is the fact that there is a relative dearth of talent at the QB position in the Big 10 this year. Boeckman and Hoyer can both expect to have better team success than Bacher, but my guess is that Bacher will have better stats when it's all said and done. Oh - and Juice doesn't have his Mendenhall shaped blanket anymore - so I count him out as well.

The other eyebrow raiser in Steve Schilling on the line. I already know what you're saying: Isn't he the kid who got abused last year by nearly everyone he lined up against? The short answer is yes. The long answer is that he is an athletic beast who will prosper under the new tutelage of the Rich Rod staff. He is also in sink or swim territory as the most experienced dude on the entire Michigan line. I'll be the first to admit that this is a stretch, and he's got to do everything right. But if he does, he's going to be a manbearfreak.

Fringe Picks

I will also admit that I don't know much about the offensive lines of any team not named Michigan, so some of these picks may indeed turn out to be total crap. Cadogen and Skinner are picks based on experience and team-success. They are 2 of a bevy of options here.

My guess is that Robiskie and Hartline won't both be on the final cut - but one will emerge as Boeckman's go-to-guy. I thought they both deserved mention, so I created a 3rd WR spot.

Well Duh

Wells and Ringer are both obvi. Benn's big-play potential will put him on the first team despite the fact that I have zero confidence in his QB's throwing ability. If Juice turns into a decent thrower this year, it will be because of Benn's brilliance. Beckem is awesome and will be one of Wisky's primary targets this year. Anytime a tight end turns himself into a primary offensive weapon, they're really really good. McDonald is on the Rimington Award watch list, and Alex Boone is one of those Buckeyes who could have easily went to the NFL, but returned to get curb-stomped by the SEC one more year (but only after beating Michigan. Again.).

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Northwestern 2008

One thing the media will harp on that is ridiculously off base:
Bright shiny offense, lots of yards, lots of passing yards, possibly a healthy “woah!” back in Sutton, returning experienced QB… One problem, Northwestern fails to turn all of those yards into points… for a team that had 11th ranked passing attack in the country, and the 32nd overall O in the land… well, finishing 72nd in scoring points to a bit of a problem. The media will focus on all of the experience on the offensive side of the ball, but they better learn how to put the thing in the end zone before anyone gets too excited about challenging the upper echelon of the conference. Northwestern fans are attaching their hopes to new personnel in both coordinator positions, and I don’t have a problem with that, just understand that until this guy proves that he’ll be more effective in getting the pigskin over the goal-line, skepticism is the order of the day.


One thing the media will completely ignore that is integral to this team's success:
Line play. Not to use statistics as a complete crutch for this preview, but, uh….

2007 Sacks Allowed: 97th

2007 Sacks: 96th
2007 TFLs: 95th

2007 Rushing O: 97th

It’d be easy to guffaw at these numbers on the surface, but we’re not about that here are we? A few caveats? Caveats: obviously more than just the D-line is responsible for sacks and TFLs, but a competent one certainly helps in those areas. It also doesn’t help that Northwestern loses their leading tackler (by 50 freakin’ tackles!!!) in LB Adam Kadela.

The sacks allowed will have to improve if Northwestern hopes to be able to find more success on the offensive side of the football. The rushing statistic is also somewhat misleading due to the fact that Not-Tyrell-Sutton was at running back for five of the twelve games last season. Although Sutton only averaged 74.5 yds/game in the seven games he did play. Needless to say however, a lack of solid experience on both lines is going to be an issue that this squad will have to overcome in order to have a successful season.

Most important contributors on each side of the ball:
I’ll whole-heartedly concur with what LTP had to say in this space: Tyrell Sutton on offense. The guy is the catalyst for this offense much in the same way that Mike Hart was for my Michigan squad over the past four seasons. In the three games where Sutton managed to get 20 or more touches last season, Northwestern went 2-1… for his career when he touches the ball over 20 times, the Wildcats are 8-3. If this offense wants to be effective, particularly in the red zone, then they MUST feature a guy in the backfield that makes defenses respect the run and the play-action, without that, you get what you’ve seen from the Wildcats lately… lots of yards, few points.

Defensively… wait… what’s happening here? (jarring painful memory) Anthony Thomas breaks through the line and….. WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MY EYES! MY EYES!!!! NO ONE TOUCHED HIM!!@#$!>? NOOOOOOOOOO! Muffled sounds of agony emanating from a hat placed over a face (/jarring painful memory)

Area that scares you as an opponent:
The fact that Northwestern appears to be oh-so-close to having one of those “puncher’s chance” offenses that on any given Saturday could light you up like a Christmas tree. I hate track meets and given the way this team is shaping up on both sides of the football, track meets will be the order of the day if you were to ask me to draw up an ideal NW scenario. If, and as with all previews this remains an “if”, the new coordinators can get this team fine tuned a bit, then Northwestern could give a number of defenses fits.

Area that makes you salivate as an opponent:
No discernable threat as a pass rusher, the line has problems protecting the QB, teams will be able to bring a lot of pressure on Bacher who will need to cut down on his picks if Sutton is anything South of 100%. Teams will look to keep the football away from the Wildcats’ offense and there are enough offenses in the Big 10 that will be capable of pounding the football that this could present a problem.

Random factor that you think will come into play this season:
Northwestern’s schedule becomes decidedly tougher at the end of the season with the final three games featuring OSU, @ Michigan, and Illinois…. BUT leading up to that stretch the Wildcats play Indiana and Minnesota. Northwestern could very well have a bowl bid locked up heading into the final stretch, making them a team with nothing to lose heading into that final stretch…

Overall Record: 8-4 (4-4) I think NW stands a solid chance of running the non-conference table, needless to say they are horrifically overdue. I think matchups with Purdue, Michigan State or Illinois, Michigan, Ohio State will all present too much for the Wildcats to handle, however, which puts them into the endless quagmire of teams finishing with a .500 record in our ridiculously early preview series... math? What’s that?


Final Big Ten Standing: 4-4 is looking to be all the rage this season… I think the Wildcats are good enough for anywhere in the jumble from 5th to 7th with Illinois and Purdue.


Bowl Destination: Capital One Bowl week bowl du jour…

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Meeeechigan 2008

Alright full disclosure: I’m a dyed in the wool Michigan fan; however, I do not find myself to be the “OMG GO BLUE!!1!!!1 everyone else suxzores” type of obnoxious fan that B2 alluded to, perhaps I am mistaken, do inform me if need be. I am biased, but I will do my best to explain my points of view on the team and back them up with [gasp] reason and logic [/gasp]. You won’t see me creating national title shirts prior to a season (AHEM like a certain Michigan blogger who shall remain nameless but deserves to have a plot in the Steve Bartman HOF). Disagree with something I have to say? Comment away dear reader, comment away.


One thing the media will harp on that is ridiculously off base
– Wooo boy, what WON’T the media harp on and in an off-base fashion? If it has the words “Rodriguez” “Offense” and/or “Spread” in it, then it’s likely off-base, and it will likely be beat like a drum to the tune of “CRAIG KRENZEL TAKES MOLECULAR GENETICS!!!! DREW HENSON PLAYS BASEBALL!!!!! THE SSSSS EEEEE SEEEE IS AMAZING!!” type of level. You’ve been forewarned… oh oh and West Virginia in any context will likely be mentioned ad nauseum. Also, if I have to hear one more time about how the entire offense won’t work because Threet doesn’t run a 4.4 40… I may snap. There’s a bevy of topics to pick from here, and even the harshest critics have to admit that Michigan certainly is the most intriguing storyline in the Big 10 right now. This naturally means way too much exposure and way too much focus that will undoubtedly carry through the season. You’ve been warned.


One thing the media will completely ignore that is integral to this team's success –
Well so far that would be anything that has to do with the defensive side of the football. You won’t hear the media harp on the returners on the D-line or our two stellar corners who are returning, nor will you hear about the talent stepping into more prominent roles in the line-backing corps (Ezeh will become a much more familiar name by the season’s end). For something as clichĂ© and well known as “defense wins championships” the defense that’s assembling in Ann Arbor hasn’t gotten a lick of a mention thus far. Here’s a little secret, they’re going to be good.


The second part of this is talent. All we’ve heard about thus far is how much Michigan lost on the offense… and hey, no bones about it, we lost a lot, but uh, guess what, there’s more to come and step into those vacated roles. The Wolverines haven’t been slacking in the recruiting department, and solid classes from the past several years will be joined by a heck of an incoming freshman class where a number of guys will likely challenge for playing time right away. No one has mentioned how much IS there. The team will be young, but it still rolls out more talent than every team in the Big 10 save for one… count the number of times THAT gets mentioned this year. Most Michigan fans will tell you that the issue has not really been talent over the years, it’s been how that talent has been utilized… and that will most assuredly change heading into this season.


Most important contributors on each side of the ball –
Without a doubt this is the offensive line. I know, I know, DUH, but I have to go with them here. If Michigan is going to have success offensively this season, then the offensive group up front will have to gel quickly and give Threet some time and the stable (and holy cow what a stable) of running backs some lanes to run in. It’s hard to imagine that Michigan would lose the number one pick in the draft and actually become better, but I don’t think they’re going to lose as much ground as some make it out to be. Aside from the excellence of Long, the rest of the line was decidedly “MEH”. The other losses aren’t going to be as big of an impact as outside observers are assuming, and the way things are shaping up, Michigan will roll out 4 red-shirt juniors on the line… not exactly a rag tag bunch of green-horns.


On the defense I have to go with Brandon Graham. Graham has the ability to become a LaMarr Woodley type of player on the D-line and could be one of the keys to an experienced front four getting consistent pressure and creating mismatches at the line of scrimmage.

Destroyer of backfields


Area that scares you as an opponent –
The unknown. Every Michigan opponent this season is getting a team they have never seen before. This isn’t going to be the “first down draws to the left behind Long 80% of the time and not kill you with its offensive weapons until they absolutely must” or the “throw the 2-yard WR screen on 3rd and 7” type of Michigan team that opponents have counted on year after year. The game-planning will be different, the play-calls will be different, and oh, oh yes, the players themselves will be different. Count me as a member of the “eeeeeeee Barwis!” club, I cannot wait to see these guys take the field come the fall: speed, speed, and more speed. The thought of Michigan’s talent with space to operate is a scary proposition indeed, and Rodriguez will undoubtedly bring a level of aggression that this team (depending on whom you talk to) may or may not have been lacking over the past several seasons. Watch how much they try to get guys like Matthews, Stonum, Brown, Minor, McGuffie (droooooool), Shaw, and others the football in space… Michigan will have a number of real burners that will likely get the ball in much better shape than Steve Breaston could’ve ever dreamed of.


Area that makes you salivate as an opponent –
Youth. Michigan’s QB will be someone who has never taken a collegiate snap as a starter. The receiving corps is also young, the line will feature new faces in new positions, and there will be freshmen getting significant playing time at various spots across the field. There will be miscues, there will be freshman mistakes, and there will be head-slapping moments. The way that teams are going to play the Wolverines early, and the way I’d game plan for them right now, would be to stack the line and force the quarterback to make plays by bringing pressure, if Threet crumbles or the o-line is anything resembling the version we saw against the Buckeyes last year, then you’ll see many Michigan fans screaming eeeek and covering their eyes.


Random factor that you think will come into play this season –
I’m taking liberty here and mentioning a few… first and foremost is the D, I love how it looks right now, it could become a force, but I will be stunned if it is anything short of very solid. Secondly, Threet (or whomever will be the QB, some seem to think Feagan may have a shot, I am not one of those people) won’t have to win games on his own. Much will be made about the lack of experience on offense and the “new system” being brought in. What will be missed is that Rodriguez will tailor the system to the players he has. You won’t be seeing a Pat White offense next year. You’ll see one that maximizes the talents of the players that are on the field, Michigan will run the football and they will use their mix of receivers to spread the field to open it up for the backs.

I think you’ll see a return of the screen (something we used to run to perfection) to the attack, and a lot of plays designed to give Threet easy and simple reads (think Tom Brady when he first started with the Patriots). Michigan simply needs the QB to be able to manage the football game and not make huge mistakes. The Wolverines are flat out LOADED in the backfield and will once again bring a number of solid receivers into the mix. They will not have to fling the football all over the field to move the chains, nor will they have to score 40 points a game to have a chance to win. For all of the hyperbole about how bad the offense could be, it won’t have to be a showstopper for the team to have a shot, and for the most part I think that is something that many out there are overlooking right now. Michigan has recruited VERY well over the years, the names won’t be as familiar, but you’ll know them by the end of the fall.


Overall Record –
Yeegads, anyone who knows me knows that I HATE predicting my own team’s record… you always get blasted and there is no middle ground. This team could legitimately cover quite the spectrum… they could be downright terrible or they could be surprisingly good, and none of us has any iota of a clue what they will look like when they tee that ball up for opening kick come late August. Naturally this means predicting the records at this point is even harder than usual, that is to say it’s impossible. First clue to our random guessing game would be to examine the road contests: these include trips to South Bend, Penn State, Purdue, Minnesota, and oh yeah, a little date in Columbus at the end of the year.


Penn State will be frothing at the mouth… again… like always… but as long as JoePa is at the helm in Happy Valley, I’m going to be confident heading into that tilt. Purdue actually scares me a bit, don’t laugh. They will return a number of players and they have given Michigan FITS in West Lafayette recently. Although I didn’t see a whole lot in the Boilermakers last year that has me trembling about this upcoming season, I think they’ll be more than ready when Michigan heads to Ross Ade. The Buckeyes stand every chance of being a ridiculous football team this year, and that game in Columbus will be a MONSTER of a challenge, to count on a win there would be sheer lunacy, but anyone who knows this series at all knows that Michigan will be ready to play come November 22nd. I don’t think it’s completely unreasonable to see the Wolverines coming out of their road schedule with a record of 3-2.


Home tilts feature Utah (not quite the creampuff you might want to see in the opener… of course after last year, nobody is a creampuff… sigh), Wisconsin, Illinois and those pesky Michigan State Spartans. Michigan hasn’t dropped four games at home since 1967, and since 1995 has put up a decent record of 74-12 (that’s a pretty solid 86% clip). Michigan Stadium might not be a decibel beast, but the Wolverines have defended their home turf rather well over the years and so I’m going to lean hard on home field advantage here. Michigan’s defense will keep this team in games this season, and there just aren’t many offenses on the schedule that give one pause when staring 5 or 6 months down the line. I’ll set the bar on the higher end and say 6-1, giving us an overall record of 9-3.


Final Big Ten Standing –
This one is tough, I have to put a chill in my heart and count the Buckeyes as the better football team, so there’s one… Illinois and Michigan State are the “punchers chance” teams that we’ve already discussed thus far, but with both games coming at home I think Michigan will be able to take care of business. Wisconsin will be solid again and I’m calling that a toss-up and likely our toughest home game on paper right now, but it is the Big 10 opener, where Michigan has been otherworldly good over the years, so keep that in mind. Somewhere in those three games Michigan might stumble, so we’ll go with one L out of those 3. Penn State fans are already beating their chests about this upcoming matchup, and that’s laughably premature, the Nittany Lions will likely be favored at home, but keep an eye on that October 17th tilt. Penn State has more questions than they’d like you to know about and losing Sean Lee is a big blow to that defense, me thinks Michigan hangs tough in Happy Valley, JoePa has yet to prove that he can game plan against the Wolverines and I don’t expect that to change suddenly now. A defensive battle favors Michigan whether Bob Nittanylion fan thinks so or not. I don’t know why, but the Purdue game seems to be the one lurker to me that bugs me. It follows on the heels of the Penn State and Michigan State games and just seems to be the kind game that might jump up and bite a young team… call me somewhat concerned there.


After all that jabbering, I’ll go 5-3 in the Big 10; good enough for a possible top 3? Opposing Big 10 teams are licking their chops now, but I’m telling you that many are going to get a lot more than their fans are bargaining for at this point in time. The defense will give the young offense ample time to find its feet and keep the pressure of having to score every time it touches the ball far away. Rich Rodriguez CAN coach, the guy knows what he’s doing, and despite the pedantic defamation of the guy’s character by many (I’m sure all are well versed on the situation and its various intricacies), I don’t see a whole lot of people out there questioning his coaching ability.


Bowl Game Destination –
9-3 would bring another New Year’s Day bowl of lesser distinction and be a colossal upset to the Kirk Herbstreits and Beano Cooks of the world… and a tremendous smile across the face of yours truly. Optimistic? You bet your ass, but that’s how I roll.

GO BLUE!

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Soapbox Time!

I don't want to get off on a rant here... but... (cue Tears for Fears)

For those who are unaware of James Hardy's existence, I can't fault you, but here's your synopsis: he was a highly talented receiver who through some sort of odd sequence of events ended up at Indiana University... set all kinds of records and was a veritable force in that offense, declared early for the draft and was picked up by the Buffalo Bills. Oh, oh yeah, and he also is a world class human being*, as exemplified by this, and oh yes, this...

Some might notice a bit of a "TREND" here... but hey, why not take a chance on this walking disaster? He's tall and can catch a football! It's stories like Hardy that aren't hard to predict, and in fact I'll go ahead and go out on a limb here and guarantee red and blue flashing lights await this individual in the near future, and it'll likely be something that'll be worse than his ol' pa deciding not to press charges despite taking a beating and being threatened with a weapon. It's mystifying how you hear things like "character issues" thrown out about players entering the draft and nobody ever makes too much of a big deal out of it... it's funny how that word covers things like "baby's momma beater" and "father beater" "threaten father with a gun in hometown" type of individual. Hey, congratulations Buffalo! He'll be a tremendous addition to your squad!

Come on over guys and check out my crib!!!

It just amazes me that somewhere, someone is willing to pay an epic failure of a person like Hardy MILLIONS OF DOLLARS despite every piece of evidence that states this guy is destined for a number on his back that is damn sure going to be longer than two digits... it's this portion of sports that causes me to frown as a fan. Where are people's backbones? Integrity? Where's the ability to tell some sleeze-bag like this to go ahead and pull it out his own ass? Sorry James, you sure have all the physical tools, but you're a complete dumbass, we're going to look elsewhere.

The saddest part is that I have literally zero doubt in my mind that this kid will be a colossal problem and likely end up literally hurting someone in the process. In fact, take it to the bank and lock it up, and go ahead and remember I said so when everyone gets "stunned" by the most recent act of violence by a professional athlete.

*Or a complete low-life scum sucking failure who will no doubt be involved in some sort of heinous violent act against a family member or loved one within the next 3 years... you know, whatever works better for you.

Rant off.

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Des Moines… it’s in Indiana or something

Little Spinal Tap for everyone there to get us off on the right foot. And yes Iowa faithful, I know that the University of Iowa is located in Iowa City, thank you.

Hey, remember when there were at least two separate occasions last November where Michigan fans like me were trying to come to grips with LOUD rumors of Kirk Ferentz to Ann Arbor?? Oh I can shrug and smile now, but those days were some of the worst in recent memory. I recall how it began…

(A gentle waking to a cool gray late autumn/early winter morning)… stretchhhhhhhh… yawn, scratch, perhaps I’ll have some Smart Start today, that Special K just doesn’t get it done anymore, ah good the coffee’s done, let’s just set this down while I just check out the ol’ rumor monger machine shall we? JESUS TAPDANCING CHRIST! Who in the name of Bump Fucking Elliot are we looking at? Kirk Ferentz… (hits refresh)… not joking… (refreshes again)… but wha… no way… we’ll be fine, I’m going to enjoy this fine java while I wait for the “har-har just kidding here” PBBBBBBBBBBBBTTGHHHHHHHH! Oh it burns! It burns!! Wait what do you mean there’s a goddamn flight that was tracked from Cedar Rapids to Ann Arbor, they have PLANES in Cedar Rapids?! It’s not conceivable, (refresh) (refresh) (refresh) repeat for 8 hours a day until rumors subside… which oh by the way was somewhere near 9045 years… Not since Tim Dwight scared the ever loving bejeezus out of me in ’97 have I been that terrified of something from Iowa... so anyways, yeah on to the Hawkeyes, alright!

1. One thing the media will harp on that is ridiculously off base – Let’s get back to our friend Kirk Ferentz for a quick second… The media seems to constantly portray this guy as a worker of miracles with “lesser talent”. Hey, I’ll give him all kinds of credit for his three year run that started in ’02, but uh… other than that burst of success, in the always fair and objective game of college football, his last three seasons have left a lot to be desired. That’s 1-game-above-.500 level of desire by the way. Iowa had a top 10 or top 15 recruiting class in 2005, they should be coming into the prime of their careers this season, but uh… through either horrific character misjudgment or even worse luck with injuries, I wouldn’t say that the excitement is brimming over at this point. I’m not saying Ferentz is to blame for all of the problems with the program, but uh, there have been more than a few, and at some point don’t you have to look at the coach? The media won’t, they’ll extol him as a great molder of talent if Iowa shows as much as a pulse this season, but I wonder how much patience Iowa fans really have at this point.

2. One thing the media will completely ignore that is integral to this team's success – First things first, Iowa gets out of playing both the Buckeyes and the Wolverines this year, which is the greatest gift the Big 10 can give to a team. Actually on the field the slotted starters on the O-line are looking like they’ll play different positions from where they were respectively last season. Seeing as how Iowa’s O-line was somewhere between god-awful and “Michigan-against-Ohio-State-Non-Existent” last season, perhaps this shakeup was the only real option/idea the Iowa coaching staff had. Oh, yeah, and THERE’S A BATTLE AT CENTER!!! YAH!!! Kirk Ferentz has a freshman son who might play center someday too! Holy crap! Center love all around!! In all seriousness though, there is experience here, if they can somehow be even a serviceable unit, Iowa will be a much better offensive football team than the 2007 version… which was 110th in the nation in scoring offense (wow). Oh oh, and the scoring defense? 12th… I’m sure the team meetings were a BLAST for the O last year!

3. Most important contributors on each side of the ball – In case you haven’t noticed, I LOATHE picking the quarterback in this section, but I have to here. Iowa has no discernible talent at running back that is capable of even walking right now. They do however have a surprisingly well stocked cabinet of wide-receivers though. They will be worthless if Christensen or Ricky Stanzi (which is perhaps the most polar opposite name of Bronco Nagurski that one could ever have) can’t get them the football. The rushing game will also be hapless without the threat of danger through the air. Defensively? Iowa has always had at least one linebacker on the field that is nothing but a guy who goes out and flat out makes plays, and I don’t think there’s any reason that’ll be different this year, and the few times I saw Iowa play last season (key word: FEW) A.J. Edds looked impressive.

4. Area that scares you as an opponent – Iowa was on their way to closing out the season on a bit of a high note before choking on applesauce against Western Michigan. Perhaps the Hawkeyes were starting to figure a few things out? They scored 120 points in their first 8 games and managed to get to 102 in their final four… I’m reaching I know.

5. Area that makes you salivate as an opponent – Hey did you hear that Iowa lost 17 players from its 2007 roster? Oh, oh yeah, and right now this is their running back:

I mean when I hear Paki O’Meara, I guess this comes to mind…

6. Random factor that you think will come into play this season – Remember how Iowa had that bit of success years ago and all of a sudden they were the chic pick every year with Drew Tate to be the team to beat in the Big 10… and they pretty much were as far from that as possible? Well now with the glare of expectations out of the way, perhaps Iowa will have the chance to sneak up on some people. If they get any kind of a running back, the offense has nowhere to go but up.

7. Overall Record – 7-5, Iowa heads back to the bowls, but not by too big of a margin.

8. Final Big Ten Standing – There are a number of teams in the conference that are simply more complete football teams than Iowa right now, missing out on Ohio State and Michigan is a gift, but I still don’t think Iowa is going to be much more than a .500 Big 10 team. Call it 4-4 again this season, which I’ll say is good for a big ol’ tie in the middle of the conference in the 5-6-7 range.

9. Bowl Game Destination – I guess that’d mean either the Motor City Bowl or the Insight Bowl??? Something like that…

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Behold The Future! Illinois 2008

1. One thing the media will harp on that is ridiculously off base – Did you know Illinois has a quarterback named Juice Williams? Yes, indeed that’s his name… no one in the media apparently cares that this guy hits the broad side of the barn at about a 50% clip. Can he run? Yes, yes he can. Can he throw? Well he did manage to improve his completion percentage from 39% in ‘06 (wha wha whaaaaa?) up to 57% in ’07, but with only 22 TDs against 21 picks in his career… suffice it to say that by bottling him up, this team will bog down in the offensive department. Don’t expect this to be mentioned though, Illinois had a big turnaround last year, and they feature an athletic QB!!! They’ll show highlights of his unconscious game in Columbus (and what a performance it was!) and ignore the fact that this guy simply hasn’t been that good at throwing the football, nor will he have MANBEAST Mendenhall next to him in the backfield. In fact, they’ll likely base his season outlook off of that game and that game alone… oh… what? They HAVE?

2. One thing the media will completely ignore that is integral to this team's success – How about Ron Zook’s complete and utter ineptitude at managing a football game? Great recruiter? Sure! Solid sideline presence on Saturdays? Uhhhh… no. Too many examples to name; let’s just say that as long as he’s there they will bring in talent and he will make gameday decisions that leave Illini fans very confused. How soon do you think you’ll see the mismanagement of his top two quarterbacks by yanking Williams and throwing in Eddie McGee on a whim? 2nd quarter of the Mizzou game? 3rd?

Random-other-things-the-media-will-likely-ignore… ummm probably that 49-17 asswhippingundressingbehindthewoodshedstompingbeatdown that USC put on the Fighting Politically Corrects back in January… or perhaps that after Mizzou, Illinois plays the Chicago Symphany, Peoria Girl Scout Troop #254 (away), and the Illinois State IM flag football champs for the rest of their out of conference schedule. I don’t know, pick one.

3. Most important contributors on each side of the ball – Whichever running back not named Rashard Mendenhall steps in will be a big question, but I’m going to say that Arrelious Benn will be one of the most important players in this offense. If he can bail Williams out and be any kind of a reliable target, the way you defend Illinois completely changes, the kid is a star waiting to burst out, they just have to get him the football. On defense, I’ll go with Brit Miller, who despite his name is a linebacker… a four year starter at that!

4. Area that scares you as an opponent – The fact that Juice Williams could black out for 60 minutes and play a game like he did in Columbus last year… they really held that ball for over 8 minutes on the final drive? Really?! Shudder…

5. Area that makes you salivate as an opponent – No Rashard Mendenhall and near as anyone else can tell, a quarterback who isn’t going to be picking you apart any time soon… Defenses game-planning against Illinois will put 23 people in the box… at least that’s what USC appeared to do.

6. Random factor that you think will come into play this season – Two things here: Illinois starts Big 10 play @ Penn State and @ Michigan. Regardless of the current situations at both schools, that’s a tough start to the conference slate, and tripping out of the box may impact this team more than a more experienced squad. Secondly, there’s the chance that Arrelious Benn turns into a wide receiver that should be playing for Michigan or Ohio State and enables Juice Williams to throw Kurt-Kittner-8th-grade-lob-balls and complete them due to Benn’s complete and total level of awesomeness… if this happens, count me as someone who will be highly annoyed.

7. Overall Record – Mendenhall was a beast last year and Illinois caught quite a few people by surprise… including apparently Ohio State. This team was capable of playing quite well, but they lacked consistency, and now they lack their MANBEAST tailback… I think a slight regression towards the mean is on the horizon for the Politically Corrects… call it 8-4 with all four losses coming in-conference… the Mizzou game is a tossup and I’ll lean the Illini way for them on this one, Big 10 solidarity and all.

8. Final Big Ten Standing – Not too hot, not too cold, jusssssssst right, so I say 5th.

9. Bowl Game Destination – Wooo boy, where does the 5th place Big 10 team go? Motor City Bowl? I don’t know… We’ll call it a “Late December Capital One Bowl Week Special” and leave it at that.

Whaddya say Beauford?

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Peace Talks Coming to Fruition Between BTN, Comcast?



Get excited, because what was used to be free is now free again. Maybe. Well, probably not even maybe, but hey, it's a start. According to this and this, it looks like the Big Ten Network will be on Comcast Digital basic in time for football season, but only in the Big Ten footprint. This seems to me to be screwy because...well...the B10 footprint was (before the BTN) already getting their local games.

However, congratulations are in order for Comcast and the BTN for successfully reinventing the wheel. Big Ten footprint dwellers - you can now watch your local teams with the added benefit of terrible camera angles, worse announcing, and the probability that a commercial will cut into the first play upon returning from a time out.

This is a good sign for Comcast users, but it's not exactly a reassuring sign for those who like to practice common sense. The BTN is just offering (only to those living in the footprint) a service that was once offered for free - namely being able to watch your local B10 team in your living room. If the BTN truly wanted to be innovative and new, why don't they branch out and say...offer the network to people who never got the local coverage? Wouldn't that make more sense? I live in Boston, and I never got local coverage of Big Ten football. Why not go out to markets that hold a big contingent of B10 grads and fans, but don't have any local coverage?

It doesn't make sense to me, but the whole network is generally baffling, so I guess it's par for the course. I will (not living in the footprint) continue to go to sports bars to watch BTN games, because the BTN seems convinced that reinventing the wheel and offering the same service for local teams + headache is the way to go. If you're living in the footprint, you can now enjoy the shoddy broadcasting from your couch. If you live outside the footprint, and never got the local coverage to begin with...well...umm...you're still screwed.

Tuesday, February 5, 2008

State of Big Ten


The Big Ten Conference. Bastion of all things...dusty?

Yes - dusty - as in "three yards and a cloud of" which would be just fine if this was 1967, and we were all screwing with whatever or whoever we could our filthy hippie hands on. Unfortunately for us, it's not, and due to legal proceedings still pending, we've learned our lesson. Nope, no more smoking up while going down, because it's 2008 baby, and that shit's illegal in most states, and at least partially frowned upon where it's not. Nope, here at State of Game, we've been blogging sex and drug free since we started. That, of course, leads us to believe that there may be a direct link between "sex and drug free" and "blogging" that we're investigating further. We'll keep you posted on any findings.

Dust.

It also settles on things that are old, antiquated, and stagnant, which is much of what the Big Ten has become. Yes siree, it's 2008, and that cloud of dust that the Big Ten so fervently kicked up in the 60's and 70's is now settling on programs that refuse to adapt. Need evidence? Look no further than the class of the Big Ten - Ohio State. You have to peel back that shiny paint job that Ohio State's fans have hastily painted on to see the truth, and I can't find a better way to state it than this post at Dawg Sports which basically backs up the fact that Ohio State and BYU aren't really that far apart. Oh - and Ohio State has regularly bitch-made the entire Big Ten for the past 5 years or so. When your top program is being compared to BYU - and there is some legitimacy to it - your conference is in trouble.

Three yards and a cloud of dust has turned to dusty. Witness the annual event that is "Big Ten Champ gets Crank Slapped by SEC for Title."

While this may appear to be a bunch of Big Ten bashing, I assure you, it isn't. There are several very good things going on in the conference. For one - despite the Dawg Sports post, Ohio State and Michigan continue to be national powerhouses. They compete for top recruits, and benefit from the BCS. Run the table in the Big Ten - no matter how weak - and you'll at least get the chance to play for the title. The Big Ten has a fervent fan base, and a local talent pool comparable to any in the nation (Ohio, and quickly ascending Pennsylvania). The top dogs aren't bereft of talent by any stretch of the imagination - and the hiring of Rich Rodriguez only points to more good things to come for the cream of the crop. Ohio State is also to be commended for their future schedules, which include a home at home with USC.

But this isn't just about the top two programs of this numerically challenged conference. Michigan and Ohio State will be fine. What of the remaining 9? (9+2=...10? Academics are important kiddies)

Well, the other programs rank a combined...not so good. And this - far more than lack of speed, strength, or coordination - hurts the two at the top. Honestly, can you point to one program not named Michigan or Ohio State and say "now there's a team that could challenge the nation!!" I didn't think so. Sure, there's the "team de jour" each year. You know who they are because the God Damn Stone Cold Soothe-Sayer Kirk Herbstreit picks them every year to win the Big Ten. Wisconsin, Penn State, Iowa, and Purdue are the usual suspects. When those teams, along with everyone else, turn in mediocre years, it diminishes the value of Ohio State and Michigan's victories over them. In order for Michigan or Ohio State to gain more respect nationally, the other teams in the conference are going to have to start getting better. Ohio State's got the memo - they're schedule proves it. Michigan, through no fault of their own (who'd have guessed that ND would suck so bad?), continues to play patsy's.

One thing that will shake off the dust will be the schedule change that the Big Ten will implement next season. It involves a real-live bye week that puts the Big Ten well within the realm of Big Boy football. Now, instead of ending the season a full week (sometimes 2!) before the rest of the nation, the Big Ten will be fresh in the minds of the pollsters who determine the bowl rankings. For this, the Big Ten should be commended.

Ohio State and Michigan continue to dominate into the future of this conference. Ohio State shook off a lot of the dust that had been accumulating when they hired Tressel, and started Bitchmaking Michigan year in and year out. Michigan shook off the dust with the hiring of Rich Rodriguez, and should start handing out some slappings of their own once his system comes to fruition. Much of the rest of the conference is set to do some shaking soon. Paterno won't be around forever, nor Tiller. Penn State could contend for championships almost immediately, while the right coach at Purdue could have them in good bowls on a regular basis. The future is certainly bright for this conference, but as it stands right now, the cloud of dust kicked by Woody and Bo still resides on the majority of programs who refuse to enter the next generation of football, and until they do, the top dogs will suffer.